This Is The End?
Doomsdayers and naysayers rejoice, for the much-anticipated Buffalo Sabres' season of '11-'12 is almost at an end (mercifully). Note how I said that the Sabres' season is almost over, because there's still lots of hockey to be played, through into June as the playoffs morph into the Stanley Cup finals, where yet again the Queen City shall not be represented. And don't tell me that there's still twenty-six games on the Sabres schedule, because it would take a record of 18-5-3 from here on out to even stand a chance of grabbing that 8th playoff spot with 93 pts.. and this set of players and coaches does not give anyone the warm fuzzies that they can go on that sort of a run.
So what happens next? Keep it here after the jump to find out.
There is a certain segment of the Sabres fan-base that is actually quite thrilled that the Sabres have flamed out like they have, with the dying embers of playoff hopes serving as a rude and stark warning that money will not buy you championships (ask the New York Rangers fans about their debacles of the last decade or so). Mr. Pegula's riches have bought us some horses, and the meadows, made the cart path to the water, and even bought the darned lake, but he can't get the horses to drink. Is it the horses? The stablemen? Both?
I like Terry Pegula's business sense. He has made a fortune in a niche industry like hydrofracking, correctly gauging this nation's dependence on fossil fuels and investing heavily in it, with the resulting mammoth payoff. As has been noted more than a few times, it does appear that the Sabres fan within him has ruled some of the decision-making processes, and this season's debacle will certainly bring him to a rude awakening. His chief right-hand man Ted Black is no chump either - as part of Mario Lemieux's team of executives that turned the Pittsburgh Penguins from pitiable castaways to perennial contenders, Black comes with impressive credentials but might have been too hasty in committing to Lindy Ruff & Darcy Regier.
What I do expect is that there will be a full re-evaluation of this organization, top to bottom, come summer 2012. Pegula & Black have to take a long hard look at how this organization is going to go about ensuring that the Buffalo Sabres sole reason for existence will be to win the Stanley Cup, and then another one..
At this point it is pretty obvious that just a few tweaks here and there are not going to change this team into a playoff heavyweight. There is something deeply flawed here, like a rotten apple, and it's spreading throughout the bushel. I do not pretend to know enough about the locker room chemistry and who the leading voices are behind closed doors, but the right voices are not speaking up loud enough and/or the loudest voices are not the right ones. The so-called core that has played together over the years and come up from Rochester have now been given ample time to prove themselves, and all they have proven is that they are not championship material. Make no mistake, there are some very good hockey players on this squad, but either they do not fit the system or do not possess the tenacity and leadership required to make their mark among the elite.
With that said, here is what I'd like to see from the Sabres over the next few months, beginning with the period leading up to the trade deadline at the end of the month. As always, feel free to jump in with your ideas and comments.
Do not mortgage the future, yet - since evidently the present generation is not going to lead us to the Holy Grail, it would be criminal to give away any prospects for a rental player for the rest of this season. I hope the management can accept with humility that this season is a wash and we shouldn't be wasting any more resources on it. February is a sellers' month, so any player that can be sold for above asking price needs to be moved. This will have a two-fold benefit - creating cap space going forward, and also more opportunities for prospects, which leads to the next point.
Test the youth - with all the injuries the Sabres had this year, we've had extended looks at a lot of the younger players who should be wearing the blue & gold in the years to come. There is no reason to stop playing them now that rash of injuries is behind us. We might as well find out earlier rather than later who can make it in the big leagues and who cannot - regular season games against teams vying for a playoff spot are a much better examination of ability than training camp and preseason friendlies will afford.
Bring in the big guns - an executive committee needs to be assembled right away. This group is going to analyze where we went wrong this year, how to remedy the situation and what needs to be done for the coming year, as well as lay out the blueprints for at least a five-year plan depending on observations on where the NHL is headed. They will also be charged with deciding if Regier & Ruff merit holding on to their positions, and what is required of them if so. This panel should comprise Pegula, Black, advisors Ken Sawyer & Cliff Benson, a Sabres financial officer, a selection of ex-players still affiliated with the team formally or informally (Perreault, Robert, Gare, Robitaille), a member or two of the scouting team (Kevin Devine, Jon Christiano) and also look to enlist a couple of hockey analysts who could possibly retain their positions as consultants on the management team. If money is indeed not an object then let's have some innovative hockey minds on board, this group needs more hockey mavens and fewer business moguls (or else we might as well have kept on a certain unnamed architect from the previous ownership!).
Define this mysterious 'system' - if indeed Pegula & Black have decided Regier & Ruff are still going to handle the reins to the team, then they need to be more accountable. The GM & coach need to present to the executives a gameplan of what 'system' the Sabres are going to play and what kind of players are required that can fit into the system. This should be reviewed and approved by the executive committee. After which, this group will then determine who on the current roster (prospects included) fits the mold, can learn to fit the mold or is surplus to requirements. The scouting team then needs to compile their list of who in the NHL is a good fit for the system, and forward this list to the front office. This is when the fun begins, especially for fans, as we get to place wagers on our personal wishlists for the players we'd like to see skating out onto the ice at the FN Center.
Throw out the baby, bathwater, washbasin and the towel - however, if the committee decides that Regier and/or Ruff are not the way forward, then pretty much everything at FNC that's not nailed to the floor needs to go. The managing group will then conduct interviews for potential GMs and/or coaches, and placing emphasis on success at the playing level (see Lemieux, Mario & Yzerman, Steve). Enough of passing on the legacy of acceptance that we have gotten used to, there has to be a change in mindset here - if change is to take place then it must be embraced wholeheartedly, not just swapping out one component at a time.The new leadership then determines who stays, who is cut and who is dealt away.
Speaking just for myself, the only way I tolerate another season of futility (or to use the word's fancier cousin - 'rebuilding') is if the above steps are taken in a clear and visible attempt to enforce change, no more status quo. Trust me, I'm not trolling on the Sabres or jumping off the bandwagon or anything - I love the Sabres just as much as you do, but I am not liking what the organization has become, and I know I speak for a decent-sized section of the fans when I say this. Let's hear your thoughts now.
61 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Holy Chicken Little Batman!
that is all…
"WE’RE SUPER FREAKY" – STEVIE J
The Bills are like your parents. You can’t choose them, and no matter how much they disappoint you, and no matter how much you want to hate them, you simply love them. - BuffaloOwdaTwnr
Why do we need an "executive committee" when there is a team president and a GM?
And why on earth should they have sway over the GM or coach? You might as well call it GM/coach by committee – which would surely be a disaster.
The managing group will then conduct interviews for potential GMs and/or coaches, and placing emphasis on success at the playing level (see Lemieux, Mario & Yzerman, Steve).
Wait, what? Being an elite player in no way shape or form means they’d be a good GM or coach (and Mario is neither, I don’t know what he’s doing there). And for all the hoopla Yzerman got last season, what happened this year? A team with the same amount of points as us, that’s what.
Save Jenrry Mejia!
2012 Amazin' Avenue Offseason Plan: 2nd place
I agree.
This type of position already exists in the organization with Ken Sawyer, who oversaw a successful rebuild and team revival in Pittsburgh. Making a committee to make decisions would probably complicate the process, since getting a number of people to agree in a democratic situation is much harder than making a decision in a dictatorship. I understand Calvin’s premise: more people could equal more ideas on how to fix a situation. I think that is true, but I would like for Sawyer to be given time to work at this since it is a job that he has only had for one year in this organization.
Additionally, this year has sucked…all of us can agree on that…but blowing up the front office that was just established at the end of last season is probably not the best route. We can rebuild/trade/hire a new GM or coach while not forming a committee that would more than likely slow down and complicate the process.
"We’re gonna win the Stanley Cup. Then, you know what, we’re gonna win it again,"
-Terry Pegula
Don't give credit to former Pens Execs...
Black and Sawyer are fromer Penguins front office execs that rebuilt the Pens with at least 4 Top 3 overall picks (Fleury, Crosby, Malkin, Stall). Any idiot could do that.
How can you write that they oversaw a successful rebuild in Pittsburgh without acknowledging the fact that just like the Blackhawks, Lightning, and now Oilers, they couldn’t have done it without first being one of the very worst teams in the NHL for consecsective seasons?
by buffaloranger on Feb 16, 2012 10:34 AM EST up reply actions 3 recs
So are you suggesting to have an “executive committee”? And why can I not write that they oversaw a successful rebuild without explaining how they did it? It still was successful, and they could quite possibly reshape our roster without needing top picks for consecutive years. It sounds like you are saying they can’t do it here because they have only done it once before with top draft picks, which is unfair to say and something you wouldn’t really know. You could be right; our FO could fail us unless we are awful for years, but I am not ready to throw in the towel on a group who has been in place for just under 12 months.
The Pittsburgh rebuild was quite amazing since they were able to hit on all top picks and turn it around so fast. The Blackhawks on the other hand did not make the playoffs for 10 years until they finally hit on some top first round picks (Toews, Kane). The Lightning had two top picks in 2008 (Stamkos) and 2009 (Hedman), and while they had a deep run last year, they are in the same spot we are this year. The Oilers have not been rebuilt; they are still rebuilding and will probably get a top 5 pick this season to add to their collection.
Not every turnaround needs to be done with high end draft talent; you listed four teams out of 30 that are experiencing “rebuilds” through top talent, while teams like Boston and Anaheim have won Cups without top picks contributing heavily to their effort. Also, Montreal, San Jose, and Vancouver have had teams that make deep playoff runs without recently drafting (past 10 years) in the top 5. Detroit has an amazing farm system that can develop talent and continue to make their team successful. Are teams more likely to rebuild through top 5 picks in the draft for multiple seasons? I would say yes. Is it necessary to do that to win a Cup? No it isn’t.
I will give this FO time to “right the ship” so to speak; if they cannot do it in a few years, then we can throw them out. This whole season is not a derivative of their work, and Sawyer/Black should be allowed to have time to make their own decisions on the future of our team (whether it be a new GM and/or coach or whatnot). Again, this year has been awful, but writing off the FO before they have been able to make changes is not fair or just.
"We’re gonna win the Stanley Cup. Then, you know what, we’re gonna win it again,"
-Terry Pegula
how can you explain
the Red Wings? TWENTY straight years in the playoffs…
Eight of those twenty they had NO pick in the 1st round and some years didnt draft until the 3rd round.
NEVER picked #1 overall, one time in the Top Ten…(hey we picked #1 overall ,how did Pierre Turgeon work out for us? Not as well as Brendan Shanahan at #2)
Typical thumbsucking Buffalo whine & cheese thinking. Always someone else won the lotto and we never get a break,bla,bla,bla.
Its called have a good owner willing to spend. Check.
Then give it to a competent GM to run the show as he sees fit. Well, about that,um…
They have a chance to dump Darcy this offseason and bring in a GM with past Cup experience with power to choose his own roster AND coach IF necessary.
Anything else is wash, rinse,repeat.
What does Darcy have to do with Turgeon?
Save Jenrry Mejia!
2012 Amazin' Avenue Offseason Plan: 2nd place
did you go to school with Tim Thomas?
by Frank Reich Revolution on Feb 16, 2012 5:04 PM EST up reply actions
Because they weren't the ones who got them into that crapy situation?
And just because you get high picks, doesn’t mean you’re a lock to be successful. Look at the Islanders.
Save Jenrry Mejia!
2012 Amazin' Avenue Offseason Plan: 2nd place
Gretzky - Good or bad?
Is Gretzky supposed to be an example of a great player that made a good exec or a poor one?
I wasn’t impressed with what he did with the Yotes.
The “executive committee” idea is just that.. an idea. It’s a personal opinion and I would like to hear what you all think about it, and why it would be good or bad. As far as the committee’s involvement with the team goes, I suggested that they hire and approve the GM & coach’s blueprint, and then let the pair get about their work.
And yes, being elite players might not necessarily mean that they will be good GMs/coaches, but undoubtedly their understanding of the game is better than the motley crew of lawyers and financiers that forms the brain trust of the Sabres, charged with setting what direction the team is heading in.
Smile.. tomorrow will be worse
Make up of the committee doesn't work for me
A) I would be wary of scouts, who work for Regier, being part of a committee that is supposed to give a recommendation as to whether Regier should remain the GM.
B) The opinions of former players wouldn’t hold too much extra weight with me.
C) I like the idea of an organizational review. I like the idea of getting fresh eyes on the situation. I like the idea of defining “The System” and trying to identify players that fit into that system. I’d also extend that to include the amateur scouting to draft players that are likely to fit into the Sabres program.
I’d just tweak the membership of the panel. Perhaps get someone like Craig Patrick to be a part of it…..
There already is pretty much an "executive committee" already in place but without the added layers of interference.
Team President – Ted Black
Senior adviser – Ken Sawyer
General Manager – Darcy
Head of Amateur scouting – Kevin Devine
A long list of scouts
Head Coach – Lindy
A bunch of assistant coaches – Patrick, Numminen, Adams, Corsi
Save Jenrry Mejia!
2012 Amazin' Avenue Offseason Plan: 2nd place
I have always liked Ruff
but I have to say that he is a part of the problem, and not just this year. That does not mean to say I think he is a poor coach (I don’t at all), but there have been glaring flaws in his style/ability to coach that seem to directly impact this team of current players. These are all just opinions, mind you:
Pros
-He has done great work with inferior talent over the years.
-He stresses (and usually) maximizes effort in his players.
-He was instrumental in recognizing NHL rule and policy change thus leading the Sabres to immediate post-lockout success.
-He seems to command respect among players and coaches.
-He is very passionate about the organization.
Cons
-He will not maximize the “system” in order for his players to succeed with their own ability. Instead, he forces players to adopt his system, at any costs, thus minimizing their strengths while putting them in positions to struggle and not succeed. I feel this is his main flaw and what keeps the Sabres looking “average” on many nights. Whatever his or the organization’s “system” is, I agree with Calvin that it does not appear to be clear to players or personnel. Also, Ruff seems to be rigid in his design, refusing to allow experimenting with other methods to achieve results (using a trap, setting defined line types-scoring, checking, defensive, etc). I am not a coach and would have no idea if any of these would succeed, but it is his job to attempt to find out, in order to maximize the effectiveness of his players. Regardless of the players he is handed, he needs to maximize their potential and not pigeon-hole them into his/the team’s “system.”
-As much as he seems to command respect, this year has been a huge indicator that either his coaches or his players are not listening as much. The Too Many Men penalties (it seems like there has been tons of these), the lack of defensive cohesiveness, the numerous costly turnovers, all indicate that personnel are not committed 100%. While injuries have played a huge part of the downward turn, and you can not fault him for those, he has always stated that the “system” goes throughout each level of the organization. Certainly, if the “system” fails, then these are faults of the coach/coaches, even if the players are the ones to make the mistakes. Mistakes over and over again indicate that the coach is not doing enough to hold his own personnel and players responsible or accountable, in my opinion.
I think if a real “mindset” change is needed, top to bottom, then it is either time to move on from Ruff or get him to make changes in his own designed “system.”
Of course, having a true, scoring, #1 line would help everyone here, yes? I feel like that has been gone for years and we have had #2/#3 line players all over the ice and in all situations. Sacrificing 1 outstanding line in order to have 3-4 “decent” lines doesn’t win championships, I think, regardless of the depth it may provide.
I rarely comment or rant…no idea what’s gotten into me! I have no idea if any of this makes sense. Damn frustrating, this team/org!
"Slide DiMaggio, slide!" "Hey, my name isn't DiMaggio, my name is mm..mmmm...mmm....mud."
by cmat on Feb 15, 2012 4:00 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
I don’t think it’s so much that Ruff refuses to change his system. I think he has several times over his long tenure. I think the issue is more that he’s not as comfortable creating a system for the talent that we have now as he is with a gritty team making half of what this team is. I think he’s better at creating a defensive system for a marginally talented team than with this particular group of guys.
I don’t think Drury was ever that good in his career. I think Ruff made him look unbelievable because he is the type of player that Ruff is very good at using. So either we have to get more guys that Ruff is good at using, or get rid of the guys that he has trouble coaching.
these are good points
and you’re right, of course, he has changed his system over the course of his career. But I agree that this current group doesn’t fit into what he’s attempting to do, and so the “system” or the players need to change. I know much has been made of Leino, for example, but if he was not a fit, then why endorse his contract? Or, and perhaps even worse, if Ruff didn’t endorse that, then where is the communication within the organization? So many questions…
"Slide DiMaggio, slide!" "Hey, my name isn't DiMaggio, my name is mm..mmmm...mmm....mud."
Right Idea / Wrong Approach
I can’t argue with the intent behind the idea, a top to bottom review and reconsideration of all aspects of the organization. I think that’s dead on. I don’t agree, however, that Pegula and Black need the sort of help you describe. We’re talking about building a successful hockey franchise from the pieces and parts of an already pretty successful one, not going to the moon.
For the record, and this is a fairly pointless set of comments, but it is worthwhile to state my starting point.
- I’m a Ruff fan. He’s won with talent thin teams. He’s won with defense first teams and he’s won with some of the most exciting run and gun teams we’ve seen. The man can coach a winning team.
- Regier has brought in some good talent with his drafts. I don’t recall a time when the Sabres had this many quality prospects rising thru the ranks. And now we’re at a point where the boundary between the Buffalo and Rochester rosters is starting to get a little fuzzy (is Kassian an Amerk or with the big club, Adam, etc.).
- I believe injuries derailed this team. Injuries slowed them initially and the spineless cheap shot Lucic took to wipe out Miller really set the team back. I believe Roy is still recovering from his injury last year (or that he’s permanently lost something after that injury).
- I was even all for the signing of Stafford to the big extension.
In short I’ve been a fan of the current regime, its moves and have been forgiving of what’s occurred over the last few weeks. With that as context, I then have to offer what I believe is the next logical step.
Blow it up. Tear it down. Start over again. List the untouchables, Vanek, Myers, Miller and… (can’t think of anyone else). After that everyone and anyone is fair game. Gaustad to the Red Wings? He’s good at face offs, but can’t score, doesn’t intimidate anyone and doesn’t make his line mates better. Roy for prospects? It would put us down a center where the team is at its neediest, but I can’t see him returning to his point a game form. Stafford? He used to be my favorite prospect, but he plays like he’s Gerbe’s size (while Gerbe plays with the abandon of a man Stafford’s size). I’m tired of his skate down the wing sort of, kinda towards the goal, only to get pushed to the right dot where he takes yet another 20ft shot. Yes, he has all the physical characteristics of someone who could be special in this league, but I’ve come to the conclusion that it won’t happen here. McNabb to Philly for Shenn? McNabb looks like a stud d-man with a physical presence. I really like what I saw of the kid when he was up. The Sabres are desparate for good young centers. Sorry McNabb, I wish I could have watched you in the Blue and Gold, but the team needs a center, one to grow up with Adam and one, perhaps to replace Roy. I could go on (and on and on…). I’d even trade Ennis, provided he’s part of a package for a single player. Ennis has done nothing bad. He’s fun, exciting and has filled in admirably at center, but the Sabres have Gerbe and Cantucci coming up. I don’t want to see the guy go, but if packaging him brings back a stud player, I’m all for it.
My point is (my long-winded point is) I’ve been a fan and an apologist for a long time. I was psyched after the Bruins game and even allowed myself to start growing hopeful, but the last two games have been disasters putting on display all the problems with the team, the stupid, pointless behind the play penalties (Roy, Webber, et al.), the inability of anyone other than Vanek or Pominville to stand in front of the opposing net (Gaustad, Stafford, I’m looking at you), etc.
The only way Pegula and Black fix this thing (and I firmly believe they will – and woe be to many when that process starts) is to wipe the board clean and start again.
by CGoetz on Feb 15, 2012 4:09 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
This just made me think
Do you guys think McNabb’s development has made Weber more or less expendable? He seems better than Weber at what Weber does than Weber is.
I like Weber, but I do think he’s one of the more tradeable players at the position where we have the most tradeable assets. He has at least shown that he can play in the NHL so it’s not like he’s a prospect and he’s on a cheap contract.
by Frank Reich Revolution on Feb 15, 2012 5:17 PM EST up reply actions
It wasn't JUST the cheap shot to Miller by Lucic
It was the league’s refusal to do anything about it. It is THAT which broke this team mentally. When Shanahan refused to suspend Lucic (and refused to suspend both Lucic and Thornton after the last game against the Bruins), the Sabres players knew that their role was that of a target.
To me, this is Ruff’s greatest failing. When the Sabres are the victims of bad officiating or biased supplementary discipline, the team crumbles. Ruff’s Sabres ALWAYS have. That is the attitude that Ruff needs to turn around. The problem is that I don’t think he can.
"I could have conquered Europe, all of it, but I had women in my life." - King Henry II of England
I know that that is the prevailing narrative in some circles
But I don’t buy it at all. The Sabres played well and pulled off character wins even after the Lucic hit. I don’t think it had nearly the effect that the guys on NBCS and elsewhere.
If you look at ’07-08 and ’08-09 they were similar seasons in which the Sabres would play well and pull off great wins followed by 10-game losing streaks that killed their seasons. This is who they are.
So they crumbled after the Neil/Drury hit?
Save Jenrry Mejia!
2012 Amazin' Avenue Offseason Plan: 2nd place
Remind me again...
…how and to who the Sabres were knocked out of the ’07 playoffs by?
Yes, they were abysmally splattered by Neil’s Senators in one of the worst playoff series they have ever been in.
"I could have conquered Europe, all of it, but I had women in my life." - King Henry II of England
So "crumbling" means reaching the Eastern Conference Finals? I wish we crumbled more often.
Save Jenrry Mejia!
2012 Amazin' Avenue Offseason Plan: 2nd place
If it had been a different opponent in the EC Finals, I wouldn’t have said that they crumbled. The fact that it was against the very same team that got away with one of the most flagrant pieces of headhunting in recent league history, yes…it was a collapse. The Sabres went into the series already knowing that they were beaten because of what had happened three months earlier.
"I could have conquered Europe, all of it, but I had women in my life." - King Henry II of England
Was it hard fitting those square pegs into those round holes?
Save Jenrry Mejia!
2012 Amazin' Avenue Offseason Plan: 2nd place
I really hope they aren’t that mentally soft. Ruff does have a reputation as a bit of a whiner though.
by Frank Reich Revolution on Feb 16, 2012 1:22 AM EST up reply actions
@CGoetz
Thank you for writing in, this is what I want to see -
The only way Pegula and Black fix this thing (and I firmly believe they will – and woe be to many when that process starts) is to wipe the board clean and start again.
Smile.. tomorrow will be worse
About development
I am NOT all about playing the kids now. I think some of them have been brought up too quickly. What I’d like to see is as many kids play in Rochester, including Adam and Kassian. Kassian, McNabb, Foligno, could all use a little more seasoning as much as we all would like them to be further along. I want those guys to become a new, less-douchey core.
by Philaster on Feb 15, 2012 4:55 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, no reason to tank the Amerks’ season too. Kassian should be back down there asap.
by Frank Reich Revolution on Feb 15, 2012 5:10 PM EST up reply actions
New Owner - New Team
I have watched Sabres’ teams for 41 years and I have never seen any Sabres’ team quit the way this team did in December and January. What is most appauling of all is the ease with which the players accepted defeat. Game after game, the same platitudes.
I seriously beleive that a coaching change would make little difference, but I also would entertain that option too, along with other changes.
First, Regier needs to go. He is the person responsible for foisting AHL-quality players on us fans. He has had 14 years to build a Stanley Cup worthy team and has failed. I’d kick him to the curb if I were Pegula.
Second, about two-thirds of the players currently wearing the Blue and Gold should be playing for other teams within the next two years. The players we currently have are not going to get us anywhere.
Third, give Ruff two years with a new set of players. If we are still fighting to get into the playoffs and exit in the first round, replace him with a younger, more aggressive coach.
In retrospect, the philosophy of splashing money around in the offseason to send the message that we’re one of the big boys now was pretty dumb. It put us in cap hell for this year and probably next, and I worry about the long-term ramifications. What message did it really send other than “hey we’re willing to overpay for mediocre/unproven players?” Won’t the agents of our RFA’s demand more now? If you want to spend more fine, that shouldn’t change what you know about value. What I really hate is that everyone knew the Leino contract was a bad idea and they were right. I hate that we’re the new Rangers.
Then again maybe if Roy and Stafford show up this year and we don’t get decimated by injuries maybe we’re a good team. Maybe they’ll make minimal changes and be really good next year. Who knows.
by Frank Reich Revolution on Feb 15, 2012 6:05 PM EST reply actions
I think Regehr and Ehrhoff were outstanding additions honestly. Ehrhoff was going to make bank regardless as probably the top D free agent last year. Leino was also going to make bank, but it was a mistake for the Sabres to add yet another winger that didn’t really fit in as Center.
We’re not quite in cap hell yet. There will still be some players coming off the books this year and with that I think inexpensive character guys can be added that will help this team. That is my hope anyway.
The Regehr trade is totally separate. And I’m happy with Erhoff’s cap hit but I’m more worried about the message the $10 mil signing bonus sends. Agents must be looking at that and salivating. But regarding the cap, it’s already limiting what we can do both this season and next. We couldn’t take on more salary in a trade if we wanted to and we’re only projected to have about $8 mil in space next season, and that’s before we resign Ennis, Kaleta and Grags.
by Frank Reich Revolution on Feb 16, 2012 1:14 AM EST up reply actions
$8M should be plenty to get Kaleta, Ennis, and Grags under contract.
Kassian will replace Boyes, Hecht might retire, and if Goose can get another $2.3M contract from someone he’ll be gone and replaced with a cheapo center off the FA pile like Erik Christiansen or Zenon Konopka.
Or if they want to go after a big name then Leopold or Stafford get shipped off.
Save Jenrry Mejia!
2012 Amazin' Avenue Offseason Plan: 2nd place
"What I really hate is that everyone knew the Leino contract was a bad idea"
We did? We knew it was a calculated risk.
And I fail to see how Erhoff with a $4M cap-hit is an overpay.
Save Jenrry Mejia!
2012 Amazin' Avenue Offseason Plan: 2nd place
A calculated risk, or just a risk? Pretty much everyone outside of Sabres-land (and several within) called it a bad deal right away. 6 years at 4.5 per is a pretty big gamble for something you’re not sure is going to work out. Maybe it will still work out, who knows, but if this is a sign of things to come for this team I’m not happy about it.
by Frank Reich Revolution on Feb 16, 2012 1:00 AM EST up reply actions
@Frank Reich Revolution
I hate that we’re the new Rangers.
This. Absolutely this.
Smile.. tomorrow will be worse
Bad Luck
The Sabres have had alot of bad luck over the years, but this year is the first time that I recall them having such a horrible time in front of the net. For that reason, I am not even certain that major changes are required.
While our record says otherwise, we may actually be closer to The Cup than we were last year. Clearly these players are not the right pieces, but they are not all worthless either. Darcy needs to do some serious dealing. If he can, he just might buy everyone another year.
Meanwhile, contingency plans should be made. If we see the same sort of stuff through the first 20 games of next year, I will be fully in favor of making systemic changes, including getting rid of Ruff and Regier.
Fire Everyone!
Clearly, my prior post was completely delusional.
Also, when I say “Fire Everyone!”, I mean literally put them in fire until there is nothing but ash left. Only Kassian and Vanek seemed to have any intensity at all tonight against the Flyers.
Excuse me while I pluck my eyeballs out, so that I am not tempted to watch this team again.
Nice Article
First let me say that. I enjoy your writing Calvin! Now I may not agree with everything (the committee idea for example), but the general principle that the apples are rotting is spot on IMHO. And I too don’t know the cause, but that’ll be up to the brain trust. I completely agree with Geo here that Reiger should go. Ruff I’m not sure of personally, but I’d be OK either way. I actually thought going into this year would have been a good time as guys like Dineen and Cunneyworth could have been had. Player wise…there are a large number that I think could be gone and probably should be gone. Then there are a
Number that I don’t mind using as bait. The only guys I really think should stay in the organization are Vanek, Myers, Erhoff, Ennis, Regher, Miller, Enroth, McNabb and Kass. So anyway, nicely written and it’ll be an interesting off season.
by buffaloparks on Feb 15, 2012 11:33 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Ruff as GM instead?
I know this has been mentioned before, just wanted to hear what everyone thought about that.
Smile.. tomorrow will be worse
Has there ever been any indication that he would even want to do that? I would think that he’d rather be a head coach somewhere else.
by Frank Reich Revolution on Feb 16, 2012 9:26 AM EST up reply actions
My gut says no
I really don’t know though…would he be looking over the shoulder of the new coach? Would he be promoted to get him off the bench (implying he’s the problem)? Does he have the creds to build a winner? I really don’t know, but my gut says if he’s gone, he’s gone. I guess it would solve the Rieger problem though!
by buffaloparks on Feb 16, 2012 11:16 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
I almost think of Regier and Ruff as a packaged deal. If one heads out, the other will….I really have no basis for that, but it is just how I feel.
Also, really nice article. I may not agree with parts of it, but I enjoy your contributions to the site. It is always good to have a good discussion when times are tough.
"We’re gonna win the Stanley Cup. Then, you know what, we’re gonna win it again,"
-Terry Pegula
Really good read
and some good comments.
kinda laughed at this one thou-
but might have been too hasty in committing to Lindy Ruff & Darcy Regier.– Regiers a straight facilatator, will do whatever the person signing the check tells him to do- wheteher its a regiem of corporate greed/impending federal prosecuting doom, classic accounting control & manipulation or the new guys. Ruffs just beyond stale, average coaching duration in the NHL is 2.6 years, (2.6yrs), give him a vp title & office somewhere.
"Will&Work2Win"coach Karma420
by Blood, sweat & Win on Feb 16, 2012 11:31 AM EST reply actions
I'll say this again
One more time for our status quo group on this site> Darcy isn’t a bad general manager just not good enough to build a championship team. Even though he has some redeeming qualities, he has enough bad ones to counter his effectiveness. Lindy, although a fan favorite for most of you, has lost this team. I for one, don’t care if he is a nice guy, he is not getting the job done. The Sabres went 2-1 with Patrick behind the bench and I thought the team responded well to him. Lindy goes back behind the bench and gets us 4-1 & 7-2 losses. As with Darcy, Lindy has redeeming qualities but has enough bad ones to limit his effectiveness.
1)He has never learned to properly rotate his goalies.
2)Juggles his lines and defensive pairings too much to allow for consistency.
3) Has really never learned to match lines by changing on the fly aka Scotty Bowman.
4) Plays favorites with some while other are consistently in the dog house. For example, leaves Brad Boyes in the line-up while sending Adam down.
5) Can not utilize players strengths, tries to make players what they are not.
6) Can’t successfully integrate acquired veterans. Guys who were successful prior to and after leaving Buffalo (Boyes, Torres, Leino, Conklin, Roloson, etc.
At what point are you guys going to put the blame where it belongs! Is it all on Lindy, no, but he is part of the problem, not part of the solution. I say leave it up to the new GM. Darcy, isn’t putting the right pieces together and Lindy can’t or won’t adapt to fully take advantage of the pieces he has!
We have a winner!
The Sabres went 2-1 with Patrick behind the bench and I thought the team responded well to him. Lindy goes back behind the bench and gets us 4-1 & 7-2 losses
And I think you are the first person ever to argue that Boyes is a “favorite” of Ruff’s.
Save Jenrry Mejia!
2012 Amazin' Avenue Offseason Plan: 2nd place
























