Buffalo Sabres 4-3 (OT) Philadelphia Flyers: Tyler Ennis Awakens
Baffled by his lack of production, Tyler Ennis remained self-assured of himself and that the goals were bound to arrive. Adamant as he was, the rookie still had an arduous nuisance of going from statement to function. Beneath the hot arena lights of the Wells Fargo Center, Ennis salvaged a win for the Buffalo Sabres that, from the second period onward, gained angst.
After two minutes and change, the 23-year-old exerted a harmless shot near the goal line and Brian Boucher's reaction was akin to that of the Philadelphia advocates. Thomas Vanek did one better by catching the goaltender from behind the net and all of a sudden, Boucher's coverage was abominable. Down low, Daniel Briere's stuff attempt on the powerplay contradicted the wishful thinking, as Ryan Miller would not be compromised. Marc-Andre Gragnani kissed a wrist shot off the post, putting Michael Leighton into full equipment and Boucher on the bench. Cut by a skate, Jason Pominville could not put any weight on his leg and mentions of Andrei Markov's achilles tendon problems, also from an errant skate, weighed thick.
While the Sabres were playing a terrific road game, signs of a struggle creeped in and Claude Giroux almost pounced on a defensive breakdown prior to the intermission. That reality sunk in when James Van Riemsdyk nested in a rebound and Andrej Meszaros wired a slap shot to shrink the deficit. Taking his time out, Lindy Ruff noticed the power of Philadelphia's attack, as they penetrated the defensemen on duty.
Alarmed and barely clinging to their lead, Buffalo's worries were justified. From the seat of his pants, Kris Versteeg stripped Chris Butler of the puck and Mike Richards linked up with Briere. Unlike his miss in the previous contest, he didn't let this chance fall by the wayside. Twice, Drew Stafford could not find a hole in Leighton, as he barged to the net and then fired a rising shot for the goaltender's shoulder to deflect.
Nikolai Zherdev drew a penalty in the late stages of regulation and if the powerplay came up with a successful strategy, Buffalo's hopes of a comeback would be deprived. On a dashing rush, Giroux manipulated a path through four opposing players and Miller's sharpness met the brilliant forward's test. The best kept secret of these playoffs in round one, Van Riemsdyk made his living in the crease constantly and anchored a 3-on-2 in overtime, but the angle was far too acute to score.
A rolling puck went in the path of Steve Montador and he found Mike Weber with yards of space on the left. Moving in from the point, he forced a pad save out of Leighton and Ennis was in prime position to tuck in the second chance. It started with the diminutive winger and it ended with him too, as he celebrated for joy in his premier performance.
Though it was not regarded as the smoothest of results, the Buffalo Sabres reclaimed the series advantage and kept their dignity intact by refusing to quit.
Man Of The Match: Tyler Ennis. Grew in stature on every shift, dodging, ducking and weaving around the ice. The early goal produced confidence and his heroics in overtime caught the Flyers off guard, as he flew in undetected. First sudden death playoff goal for the Buffalo Sabres since Maxim Afinogenov won Game Five of the Eastern Conference Semi-Finals in 2007.
Flop Of The Match: Chris Butler. Watched closely on each of Philadelphia's goals instead of tracking an opponent or protecting possession. Had no problem letting Versteeg start the build-up for Briere's equalizer while resting his legs. Will have to move forward and atone for his lapses.
Follow Rafal Ladysz on Twitter.
35 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
AWESOME
writing Rafal. Do you have any novels out? Seriously-great job and, but of course…Go SABRES!!!
The Little Man was BIG tonight!
Ennis was the player of the game all night long. Leading the rush, pushing the puck up the ice. He was the best. Survived a ton of turn overs. Thank Ryan Miller for that.
Is this a recap or a book?
Such an interesting style….I really enjoy it.
"We’re gonna win the Stanley Cup. Then, you know what, we’re gonna win it again,"
-Terry Pegula
by bgred105 on Apr 23, 2011 2:16 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
butchered the language
and clearly not a hockey expert…..but it was, uh…colorful…
overdone and confused, wanna be theatre critics should not
review playoff games.
Bucky is sure to have something tomorrow for you to enjoy.
Enjoys long walks on the beach, Molson Canadian, and making the playoffs.
by AcesNines on Apr 23, 2011 3:26 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions 2 recs
And the wannabe literary critic weighs in
So if you take his write-up as if done by a wanna be theatre [sic] critic, what does that make you and your contrived use of UK spelling? Seems to me some community college’s junior theater critic has grown frustrated his review of this semester’s Shakespeare production got bumped in favor of hockey news and so he’s going to have a hissy fit. Get over yourself. Nice review Rafal.
Anyone notice that we’re watching a changing of the guard, right in the middle of this series? Connolly, ostensibly our #1 center, who avoids hits, won’t go to the corners, won’t get in front of the net and who ends every other rush by handing the puck over has been on the bench. I’ve been a fan and supporter of his for the last couple of years. Now we see that Lindy sees him for what he is, a threat from the third line, only now instead of Drury and Briere in front of him, he’s playing behind Gaustad and Niedermeyer. I hope he enjoys his last days in Buffalo. What has he added that, say, Luke Adam couldn’t? And, too, Pominville, will any of us even notice if he doesn’t play Sunday? Stafford, our young “power” forward who, it seemed matured this year, is being out hustled by Ennis and Gerbe, who are delivering more hits, doing more down low, and putting in more time in front of the net. I don’t want to see him leave, but when kids with two and three years less experience and 50 or more pounds less weight play more effectively and with more heart, what does that say about him? Gragnani is a revelation and Myers became altogether a new player this series (how many times have you seen him crush any Flyer who thinks he can pick up a cheap rebound to the ice?
This series has also highlighted just how desperate the Sabres are for a true #1 center. Roy is a nice #2. What we need is what other playoff teams have, the Hawks in Toews, Vancouver in Sedin, etc., that one guy who makes the other team adjust their lines. Neither Gaustad nor Niedermeyer, for all their grit, aren’t that guy. Connolly never was and this series has confirmed never will be that guy.
And, too, Pominville, will any of us even notice if he doesn’t play Sunday?
I think Pominville brings a lot more to the team than most of the fans in Buffalo want to believe. He’s an excellent penalty killer, defensive responsible forward with a good shot, and a locker room leader. I think a portion of the Sabres terrible start this season was due to Pominville being out of the lineup. They started to play a lot better when he finally knocked the concussion cob webs out of his head. (The entire month of November and part of December he was floating the clouds. ) Pominville isn’t the type of player we thought he’d be when he signed that $5.3m a year deal. But he’s still a big asset and contributes to the overall success of the team.
Pominville is second on the team with 4 points in the 5 games during this series against the Flyers.
"Who else but Chris Drury!" - 2007
"Who else but...... um... yea.. about that.." 2010
by FloridaBuffalo on Apr 23, 2011 9:00 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
mobile rec!
When philly scored those two quick goals in the 2nd all I could think was that having a steady player like pommer out there for the next shift would be huge and I think they already missed his presence last night. No matter what the emotions of the game are at, pommer is always even keel and plays at the same steady level. That’s a massive asset to have.
"Starting today, the Buffalo Sabres' reason for existence will be to win a Stanley Cup" - Terry Pegula
by willgarr15 on Apr 23, 2011 9:08 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
It's called variety simon. I'll keep it at grade three level for you next time.
http://twitter.com/RafalLadysz
by Rafal Ladysz on Apr 23, 2011 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions
I wouldn’t of even responded to someone like that. He wanted to criticize your writing when he couldn’t even put together a post with proper sentence structure, punctuation, or spelling? He’s just a troll looking for a response because everyone who posted above him posted positive things.
"Who else but Chris Drury!" - 2007
"Who else but...... um... yea.. about that.." 2010
by FloridaBuffalo on Apr 23, 2011 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions
Fair point, but sometimes those people get on my nerves.
http://twitter.com/RafalLadysz
by Rafal Ladysz on Apr 23, 2011 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions
I hear ya
F that guy Rafal. Great write-up as usual. Sometimes it’s nice to hear a synopsis of the game that isn’t the same old beat-writer’s diabtribe. Keep it coming.
"Starting today, the Buffalo Sabres' reason for existence will be to win a Stanley Cup" - Terry Pegula
Keep writing them just like that!
It’s the intelligence and writing style of the editors that brought me to SB Nation a couple years ago. The sports knowledge and lack of people flaming out on bloggers that has kept me here! I don’t post much, but I am always reading this blog as well as Buffalo Rumblings. Keep up the good work!
Brought to you from Camp Prosser, Afghanistan
Thanks bflo, and thanks to everyone else who liked the recap.
http://twitter.com/RafalLadysz
by Rafal Ladysz on Apr 23, 2011 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
You could have written it in Greek for all I care
I would still have liked the recap to that game! LOL! Nice job though, a refreshing change. Great game, great write up, I love everyone and everything!
by buffaloparks on Apr 23, 2011 11:21 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Thats exactly it, Ennis awakened..you could tell how hard he was trying and how badly he wanted to play good..
he was all over the place, and butlers play on brieres goal was a bit week..
He passed it right to Richards!
That play was awful, and indicative of the type of loose play in our own end that has cost us many a game this year (not necessarily just Butler). That being said, I think Butler has has some really solid moments and is still a solid young D man. Just wish it didn’t have to have been Richards and Briere!
by buffaloparks on Apr 23, 2011 11:25 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
He just needs to be a bit stronger on the puck
People need to back off Butler. Briere’s goals in Games 3 and 5 were on him but it’s not like he made a horrible play, he was just a little soft on the puck. He is a great passer, and he has soft hands in that respect, so that gets in his way I think a little. But it’s the playoffs, and you gotta be stronger on the puck. On the other side, where was everyone else covering for him? He was playing a 3 on 1 behind the net and also Richards made a great pass and Briere made a better play receiving that out of the air and putting it in the net before Miller could go pipe-to-pipe.
"Starting today, the Buffalo Sabres' reason for existence will be to win a Stanley Cup" - Terry Pegula
Well, honestly
I think I see what you’re trying to do, Rafal, and the effort is not unappreciated. But sometimes you need to put the thesaurus down and make sure that the words aren’t getting in the way of the message. You can’t beat clear and concise.
Agree to disagree
If I want clear and concise I’ll go to Buffalo News, TSN, Sabres.com, NHL.com and read the clear and concise AP story that hit every site at the same time. At least here we get some fun reading from Rafal, IMO.
"Starting today, the Buffalo Sabres' reason for existence will be to win a Stanley Cup" - Terry Pegula
I appreciate that willgarr.
I try to keep it different from other sites and their recaps. Aside from maybe the first paragraph, I don’t see a lot of words that could confuse readers.
http://twitter.com/RafalLadysz
by Rafal Ladysz on Apr 23, 2011 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions
I know what all those words mean
But judging from the way you used some of them, I am not entirely sure that you do, exactly. I’m not sure why I thought it was my place to offer a little constructive criticism, but I please know that no disrespect was intended. That said, please choose your words with care.
I know what they mean, don't you worry about that.
http://twitter.com/RafalLadysz
by Rafal Ladysz on Apr 23, 2011 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions
I think you're confusing "clear and concise" with journalistic mad libs
I have no problem with colorful play-by-play or creative phrasing. But there is such a thing as getting lost in the verbiage, and the only people who should shun clarity of communication are politicians.
Well, let's all pull out our rulers and measure our d****
or, in this case, our scholarly learnedness. I don’t come here with expectations, just to find community with other Sabres fans and, every once in awhile, some insight and entertainment. Not sure why anyone would feel the need to criticize—“constructive” or not—a writing style. This ain’t the NYTimes. Don’t like the post, move on to the next one.
Nice recap, Rafal. Thanks for your work.
I don't mind constructive criticism, but I get irritated when people try to tell me I don't know the meaning of the words I use.
All the same, thanks for the feedback billsfan.
http://twitter.com/RafalLadysz
You don’t know me at all, so it’s tricky for me to write this. I understand both your point and simonpure’s. It can be difficult to criticize carefully, and it can be difficult to accept criticism.
I have done a great deal of writing (as both a volunteer and a professional) across numerous genres. While it appears you desire to not have the same old boring style you’ve seen, it also seems that you are trying to use too colorful a vocabulary in a way that actually hinders what you’re overall goal is. Instead of clarifying and making something colorful, it can obscure. Or it can simply seem amateur-ish.
Take this example: " Ennis salvaged a win for the Buffalo Sabres that, from the second period onward, gained angst." While I can tell what you’re trying to say, and I can tell you generally understand what angst is, this is not a particularly well-communicated thought. The game didn’t gain any angst. Maybe the fans watching it experienced more angst as they watched the game unfold, but neither the game itself nor the win, as you wrote, gained angst.
There are more examples like that in here. Sometimes, in your desire to communicate something colorfully, I have to try to guess at what you’re saying, especially if I didn’t watch the game myself.
Keep trying, don’t stop writing, but be aware that as writers, we can always improve, and we should all learn how to take criticism.
Perception is reality; but if your perception is off, you live in your own reality. -- perkispower
by thefourwinds on Apr 23, 2011 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
your overall goal, not you’re
Perception is reality; but if your perception is off, you live in your own reality. -- perkispower
by thefourwinds on Apr 23, 2011 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions
I meant the game was gaining angst in Buffalo's perspective because Philly was pressing.
Hope that clarifies.
http://twitter.com/RafalLadysz
by Rafal Ladysz on Apr 23, 2011 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions
I felt like I was reading a turn of the century
Newspaper sports column or something. That was fun. keep up the good work Rafal.
The player I would like least at #9 would be my sister’s cat, Captain Creamsicle. She does have a great work ethic and agility, but I’m really concerned that at 9 lbs., she’s too small to play safety in the NFL. She also bites way too often on play action and is easily distracted by someone waving string in the crowd. Lastly, her wonderlic score was pretty awful, answering "meow meow meow" for most of the questions- Dr. Brackish Okun

by 


























