Buffalo Sabres v. New York Rangers - By the Numbers
This is the type of game that can be extremely frustrating as a fan. You want to be pissed off at the Sabres for another home loss, but deep down inside you know they played a pretty good game. In fact, they were the better team for most of the contest.
Take away a couple of power play breakdowns, some suspect goalie play for the good guys and another remarkable performance from ex-Sabre Martin Biron and this is an entirely different outcome.
Unfortunately this isn't the first time I am writing this same post. The Sabres have consistently failed to bury their chances and make a couple of mistakes every game that seem to end up in the back of the net. Eventually this becomes a problem instead of just bad luck. I just don't know which it is right now.
If you are wondering just how much better the Sabres were last night, take a look at the stats below. The Corsi numbers are unreal and the scoring chances paint a similar picture.
The Stats
Scoring Chances - after the jump
| Team | Period | Time | Note | BUF | Opponent | |||||||||||
| NYR | 1 | 17:48 | Fedetenko | 1 | 9 | 10 | 24 | 29 | 81 | 5 | 8 | 26 | 27 | 34 | 43 | 5v5 |
| BUF | 1 | 15:53 | Adam | 1 | 3 | 23 | 44 | 54 | 72 | 6 | 10 | 21 | 32 | 42 | 43 | 5v5 |
| BUF | 1 | 9:32 | Stafford | 1 | 3 | 9 | 21 | 63 | 81 | 4 | 19 | 24 | 26 | 43 | 44 | 5v5 |
| BUF | 1 | 8:29 | Szczechura | 1 | 10 | 24 | 26 | 29 | 58 | 5 | 10 | 21 | 27 | 42 | 43 | 5v5 |
| BUF | 1 | 8:13 | Vanek | 1 | 10 | 24 | 26 | 29 | 58 | 5 | 10 | 21 | 27 | 42 | 43 | 5v5 |
| BUF | 1 | 6:21 | Roy | 1 | 9 | 10 | 17 | 54 | 63 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 17 | 43 | 44 | 5v5 |
| NYR | 1 | 5:02 | Richards | 1 | 3 | 26 | 29 | 58 | 81 | 5 | 19 | 24 | 26 | 27 | 43 | 5v5 |
| BUF | 1 | 2:10 | Ennis | 1 | 9 | 10 | 17 | 63 | 5 | 10 | 21 | 27 | 43 | 4v4 | ||
| BUF | 1 | 0:57 | Vanek | 1 | 3 | 26 | 29 | 37 | 81 | 4 | 5 | 19 | 24 | 42 | 43 | 5v5 |
| NYR | 1 | 0:16 | 1 | 23 | 24 | 44 | 54 | 72 | 5 | 17 | 21 | 22 | 43 | 44 | 5v5 | |
| BUF | 2 | 8:32 | Vanek | 1 | 3 | 23 | 44 | 54 | 63 | 4 | 17 | 43 | 44 | 62 | 5v4 | |
| NYR | 2 | 8:26 | Hagelin Goal | 1 | 3 | 23 | 44 | 54 | 63 | 4 | 17 | 43 | 44 | 62 | 5v4 | |
| BUF | 2 | 7:52 | 1 | 8 | 15 | 24 | 37 | 44 | 4 | 10 | 19 | 24 | 43 | 44 | 5v5 | |
| BUF | 2 | 7:22 | Vanek Goal | 1 | 3 | 26 | 29 | 58 | 81 | 4 | 10 | 19 | 24 | 43 | 44 | 5v5 |
| BUF | 2 | 6:42 | Stafford | 1 | 9 | 10 | 17 | 21 | 63 | 5 | 22 | 27 | 34 | 43 | 62 | 5v5 |
| NYR | 2 | 5:01 | Boyle | 1 | 3 | 23 | 54 | 72 | 81 | 4 | 22 | 34 | 43 | 44 | 62 | 5v5 |
| NYR | 2 | 1:09 | Callahan Goal | 1 | 9 | 10 | 21 | 26 | 29 | 4 | 24 | 43 | 44 | 62 | 5v4 | |
| NYR | 2 | 0:37 | Fedetenko | 1 | 3 | 23 | 44 | 54 | 72 | 5 | 17 | 26 | 27 | 42 | 43 | 5v5 |
| NYR | 3 | 16:58 | Hagelin Goal | 1 | 3 | 8 | 15 | 37 | 81 | 4 | 22 | 34 | 43 | 44 | 62 | 5v5 |
| NYR | 3 | 14:23 | Gaborik | 1 | 23 | 24 | 44 | 54 | 72 | 4 | 10 | 21 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 5v5 |
| BUF | 3 | 12:23 | Stafford | 1 | 9 | 10 | 17 | 21 | 63 | 4 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 43 | 44 | 5v5 |
| BUF | 3 | 10:44 | Kassian | 1 | 10 | 17 | 23 | 26 | 54 | 5 | 17 | 19 | 24 | 27 | 43 | 5v5 |
| BUF | 3 | 10:36 | Vanek | 1 | 10 | 17 | 23 | 26 | 54 | 5 | 17 | 19 | 24 | 27 | 43 | 5v5 |
| NYR | 3 | 10:00 | Gaborik | 1 | 9 | 24 | 29 | 44 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 22 | 34 | 43 | 4v5 | |
| BUF | 3 | 6:46 | Ennis | 1 | 3 | 9 | 21 | 63 | 81 | 4 | 19 | 24 | 26 | 43 | 44 | 5v5 |
| BUF | 3 | 6:44 | Roy | 1 | 3 | 9 | 21 | 63 | 81 | 4 | 19 | 24 | 26 | 43 | 44 | 5v5 |
| NYR | 3 | 2:59 | 1 | 3 | 21 | 26 | 81 | 10 | 17 | 27 | 34 | 43 | 44 | 4v5 | ||
| NYR | 3 | 2:34 | Gaborik Goal | 1 | 3 | 23 | 29 | 44 | 10 | 17 | 27 | 34 | 43 | 44 | 4v5 | |
| # | Player | EV | PP | SH | ||||||
| 1 | J. ENROTH | 49:03 | 15 | 7 | 4:33 | 1 | 2 | 6:24 | 0 | 3 |
| 3 | J. LEOPOLD | 17:21 | 6 | 4 | 0:23 | 1 | 1 | 3:27 | 0 | 2 |
| 8 | C. MCCORMICK | 9:23 | 1 | 1 | 0:02 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | D. ROY | 14:57 | 7 | 1 | 0:55 | 0 | 1 | 2:45 | 0 | 1 |
| 10 | C. EHRHOFF | 18:07 | 8 | 1 | 3:49 | 0 | 1 | 1:10 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | C. STUART | 9:09 | 1 | 1 | 0:02 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | M. GRAGNANI | 16:44 | 6 | 0 | 3:13 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | D. STAFFORD | 11:06 | 5 | 0 | 3:48 | 0 | 1 | 2:34 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | V. LEINO | 12:08 | 3 | 4 | 0:42 | 1 | 1 | 0:03 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | R. REGEHR | 14:35 | 3 | 3 | 0:02 | 0 | 0 | 1:57 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | T. VANEK | 13:24 | 6 | 1 | 3:49 | 0 | 1 | 1:51 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | J. POMINVILLE | 13:46 | 4 | 2 | 3:49 | 0 | 1 | 3:50 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | M. ELLIS | 10:08 | 2 | 1 | 0:02 | 0 | 0 | 1:45 | 0 | 0 |
| 44 | A. SEKERA | 15:22 | 2 | 3 | 0:44 | 1 | 1 | 3:05 | 0 | 2 |
| 54 | Z. KASSIAN | 13:31 | 4 | 4 | 0:42 | 1 | 1 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 58 | P. SZCZECHURA | 12:26 | 3 | 1 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 63 | T. ENNIS | 13:25 | 7 | 0 | 0:19 | 1 | 1 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 72 | L. ADAM | 11:45 | 1 | 4 | 0:24 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 81 | B. MCNABB | 16:31 | 5 | 4 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 3:09 | 0 | 1 |
| Period | Totals | EV | PP | 5v3 PP | SH | 5v3 SH | ||||||
| 1 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Totals | 16 | 12 | 15 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Head-to-Head Scoring Chances
* Click Image to Enlarge
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
We had a lot of chances, just no one finished.
Roy had 2 good chances in front.
Ennis had on that jumped his stick.
Vanek had 2 slappers wide.
Stafford missed the net in front.
Kassian and Leino had a good chance in front that was blocked.
My major problem with our play, shots blocked against us. It seems 3 of 4 shots from outside 20ft gets blocked away. Id love to see a blocked shots against stat. We have to less the league.
Fitz = M(C)²
"Lets Go Buff! a! lo!"
I got a TROPPer in the car, uhh!!
by bflo on Dec 11, 2011 11:36 AM EST via mobile reply actions
*lead the league.
Fitz = M(C)²
"Lets Go Buff! a! lo!"
I got a TROPPer in the car, uhh!!
by bflo on Dec 11, 2011 11:36 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Wow David
talk about # crunching, nice job.
The difference was the goal tending from the previous night & in the game itself. The similarity would be inability to put the puck in the net. I just dont see the effort/movement output at an acceptable level. Need more time to get the chemistry right, which was going to take some time, but signs need to be seen that things are moving in the right direction.
The bright spots are certainly the young players- 54, 72 & 81 stand out. Coach really needs to get #’s 10 & 23 to play at least at a notable output level (50-60%?) that they did w/their previous teams.
"Alright Men, lets go out there, bust um in the chops & get somebody bloody. Keep working hard till you get it right. Take the W in battle & make the Bills Nation Proud." coach Karma420
by Blood, sweat & Win on Dec 11, 2011 12:08 PM EST reply actions
Seriously, someone needs to do a tutorial on this
i always look past this article because i have no idea what im looking at. I would greatly appreciate it if in the future you guys did an explanation of how to look at these charts.
by manic hispanic on Dec 11, 2011 5:57 PM EST reply actions 2 recs
I will add the tutorial back into the post. I had it in there for the first 10 games of the season and then I took it out.
D.O.
www.diebytheblade.com - An SB nation destination for Sabres fans everywhere
by David Oleksy on Dec 13, 2011 8:26 AM EST up reply actions
Goaltending
Plain and simple their goalie was better than ours and yes, I thought the Sabres deserved better. You cannot win in this league with goaltending like that, plain and simple. Can’t figure out what happened to Enroth all of a sudden.
oh noes!
Someone had a bad game, let’s catapult them into the sun!
"If we needed any more motivation to win a Cup sooner than later, we've got one now," Black said. "I really want to listen to the game that RJ calls when he finally gets to shout out, 'Buffalo wins the Stanley Cup.'"
"Do it or Die Trying."
by FloridaBuffalo on Dec 12, 2011 4:43 AM EST up reply actions
Anybody listen to WGR550 Thursday??
Whats up with Roy. Sounds to me that the rest of the team isn’t to fond of him and would be happy if the brass were to trade him.
Schopp and the Bulldog
Bulldog was speculating (Schoop was out sick) that our “togetherness” as a team is hampered when Roy is in the lineup. To prove this, he looked at the time last year when Roy was hurt and the team rallied to have a great latter half of the season to make the playoffs. To him, this was a large enough sample size, and proved that Roy is not really an asset on this team and should be traded.
Of course, he did not look at Roy’s stats when he plays, or God forbid would he examine GVT or any advanced stat that would show how much of a bargain Roy is (he even stated that the listening audience would be “bored” if he started throwing stats around, since he is not a “stat-guy”). Also, he was not suggesting who we should get for Roy…I would not be surprised if he wanted Bobby Ryan in a Roy trade, since it makes more sense to get more wingers and just ignore the center position as a whole. Why don’t we run lines where no one plays center, yet we have two guys on the wing? The linesman could just drop the puck, and the opposing team centerman can just scoot down ice unopposed.
In a whole, it was just conjecture that was derived on former rumors and Bulldog’s penchant for ridding the Sabres of his scapegoat. It was exhausting to listen to because it only brings the conversation in a direction where people call in wanting to fire Ruff/Regier, or to make some huge trade for some great player that the other team would never make unless we traded a top asset from our team (Vanek). WGR is really only listenable when our teams win, and when that doesn’t happen, the show hosts in the afternoon (morning guys are not so bad) are just as bad as any idiot who loves the team when its good, and wants to blow it up when it is bad.
"We’re gonna win the Stanley Cup. Then, you know what, we’re gonna win it again,"
-Terry Pegula
Oh, he mentioned that….just did not think it was important because the team sucked when he did that.
"We’re gonna win the Stanley Cup. Then, you know what, we’re gonna win it again,"
-Terry Pegula
Don't you know you're supposed to ignore facts when they don't fit your narrative?
Save Jenrry Mejia!
2012 Amazin' Avenue Offseason Plan: 2nd place
Baseless speculation is fun, isn’t it? WGR and TBN report shit like that on an almost daily basis. Don’t believe them so easily.
Before I started reading this blog, I didn’t realize how whacked out Buffalo’s sports media coverage was.
Somehow they manage to retain a general veil of credibility with the average fan. It has baffled me for years.
I’ve always lived just far enough away from Buffalo (2-3 hrs) that I get the televised coverage but not the other media…
After reading just one Bucky article, the veil has been lifted.

by 























