TSN Doesn't Know Maxim Afinogenov Very Well

On top of that, he was a minus 17, so……

Many newspapers, magazines and book publishers have taken some extreme measures in order to save costs. Almost all of them have ruthlessly slashed copy editor positions because few were seeing the economic benefits of having such people working full time. This is why you’re seeing such obvious and prominent mistakes in all forms of written journalism, both in print and online. The publishers instead are having people who are untrained or unqualified trying to pick up the slack, they’re relying on automated processes (with sometimes very humorous results), they’re having writers self-edit or they’re simply not bothering to go through the editorial process at all in order to get stories out faster.

Simply put, failing to edit and fact-check articles properly jeopardizes your appearance of professionalism and eventually your journalistic credibility. You look amateurish and incompetent. This is not something that is happening just to organizations like TSN. It is happening even to the most widely respected of publications…like this one:
http://theslot.blogspot.com/2010/07/theres-only-one-child-myth.html

A word of advice to any newspaper, journal or professional website. If you want to look professional, rehire your copy editors and pay them well. If you don’t, you’ll look like a grade-school publication and will be taken just as seriously.

I actually read this piece yesterday and had two thoughts. First obviously they hold a higher regard for mad Max than I do and also that I thought he had posted more than 61 once. I did not research it as I was more interested in the other names on the list. Good catch rafal.