Sabres 3 Avalanche 4 SO: Third Period Comeback Leads to Shootout Loss
Why can't the Sabres play a full 60 minutes?
It seems that is the question of the ages and the Sabres recent opponents are asking themselves the same question. The Sabres had a six game winning streak snapped last night but I can't remember the last time they played a good game from the opening faceoff until the final horn sounds. During the streak they had plenty of comebacks like we seen last night and we had games like Friday when they jumped out to 3-0 lead and eventually held on for a 3-2 victory.
There are plenty of positives to take from the loss in the marathon 11 round shootout. Once again the Sabres earned a point with Patrick Lalime in goal and once again the Sabres came from behind in the third period. It would be great if they could play well for an entire game but it is comforting to know that there is no quit in this team.
Another positive for the Sabres is the balanced goal scoring. On Saturday it was Drew Stafford getting the Sabres on the board and Thomas Vanek and Jochen Hect leading the comeback. Vanek now leads the team with 12 goals and Hecht became the seventh Sabres player to reach 10 on the season.
Corsi Ratings | Event Summary | Mile High Hockey
Game Highlights
Lindy Ruff Postgame
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
“….but I can’t remember the last time they played a good game from the opening faceoff until the final horn sounds.”
Friday, December 11 against Chicago.
Exactly. The idea of a 60 minute effort is a myth. We as fans tend to forget that the opposition has the exact same goals we do… go out, play 60 hard minutes, dominate and win with ease. Unfortunately, there are 2 teams on the ice and that leads to surges of momentum and the ever-present criticism of ’they’re unmotivated, inconsistent, pampered children" or the equivalent. They didn’t play a terrible first period, but Colorado capitalized on their chances and they clawed their way back into the game. It’s one thing to come out flat and stay flat for 60 minutes. That’s the sign of a group that doesn’t care and are just collecting paychecks.
The sign of a great team is where they realize they weren’t good enough to match what the opposition threw at them, adjusted and took the game away from them. In the last 6 games where the Sabres trailed after 2 period they are 4-1-1 including going 11 deep in a SO with their backup goalie!
They’re a good hockey team and they’re winning games in a number of different ways. I find it ironic that after the ‘Whip’ segment where they discuss whether this team is for real or not, they go out in the 3rd period and get 2 (nearly 3) and send the game to OT.
I still think they need to upgrade MacArthur’s roster spot with someone who has more jam. Raffi Torres is the guy I’d love to trade CMac for. But, with the PP coming around and Myers gaining more and more confidence with every game he plays the need for a true PP QB are lessening. I think they’re one or two guys from being a sincere Cup contender given the level of competition out there this year. Torres and a veteran center/wing who can win a draw (Matt Cullen or Saku Koivu anyone?) would make this team really dangerous.
Ta,
Exactly. The idea of a 60 minute effort is a myth. We as fans tend to forget that the opposition has the exact same goals we do
I agree but it’s not effort I have an issue with. It’s the horrible giveaways and the mental mistakes that have nothing to do with the opponent.
D.O.
www.diebytheblade.com - An SB nation destination for Sabres fans everywhere
No one plays a perfect game. Given how well Hank played after that first goal, I’m willing to forget that mistake and move on. It’s hard to have a short memory as a fan. It’s exactly opposite of what the players have to have. We remember everything, the players need to forget it as quickly as possible and move on.
Ultimately, I just think that, more often than not, we hold the players and the team to an impossible standard. As we become more sophisticated in our understanding of the game our tolerance for smaller mistakes gets smaller. 1
Ta,
1 in answer to your original question I think the 1-0 Montreal game was an excellent effort.
Very well said
I would agree with the 1-0 Montreal game. Very well played game with very few mistakes.
D.O.
www.diebytheblade.com - An SB nation destination for Sabres fans everywhere
by David Oleksy on Jan 10, 2010 1:26 PM EST up reply actions
One comment about Lalime
It seemed to me that although he played reasonably well, he started looking obviously fatigued as the game went on, particularly in the shootout. During the shootout he only really made one good play (the poke check) and on the rest the Avs either didn’t have good shots against him or scored. The one that he gave up for the winner it looked like he was just trying to throw his exhausted body in front of the puck and simply had nothing left in the tank.
After the third shooter I was starting to think, “If this goes on for a while, will Lindy get him out of there?” What would it take to pull a goaltender during a shootout? It is not that Lalime was bad (he wasn’t), he was just too tired to make the plays he needed to to win the game.
"I could have conquered Europe, all of it, but I had women in my life." - King Henry II of England
Can't change goalies once the shootout starts.
by twoeightnine on Jan 10, 2010 8:35 PM EST up reply actions
So fake an injury,
and risk whatever punishment could come with it to go to a goalie who has been sitting for 75 minutes? I’d rather go with the tired goalie.
by twoeightnine on Jan 10, 2010 8:43 PM EST up reply actions
Again, I’m not saying it’s a good idea. But what are the realistic chances of punishment – “I thought I pulled my groin but the next morning when I tested it out it seemed to be ok. I’ve had problems with it in the past so I just wanted to play it safe.”
"The horse jumped over the f@@king fence."
- KV
I can’t remember the last time they played a good game from the opening faceoff until the final horn sounds.
The only game I can think of this season was the Oct 13th game against the Red Wings. But, Detroit was in such a shambles already by then, it’s hard to use that as an example.
"Slide DiMaggio, slide!" "Hey, my name isn't DiMaggio, my name is mm..mmmm...mmm....mud."
Beating a bad team is still beating a team.
Bills fan? In Colorado? It's more likely than you think.
by UZ on Jan 10, 2010 3:03 PM EST up reply actions
Penguins game
I think my favorite game this year for the Sabres was the win against the Pens where they started out down 3-0 and took Miller out of the game. Ruff was smart enough to pull Miller before it got really ugly, and the team rallied back for the win! Was it a full 60-minute effort? I guess not, but sometimes even with a 60-minute effort, a few bounces of the puck can put you behind. Being resilient when you’re down is very important, as long as you don’t make a habit of getting down early, which will kill you in the playoffs.
by mxsd on Jan 11, 2010 2:07 PM EST reply actions 2 recs
Shame, shame, shame, the Sabres lost to a team below them in the standings. They just can’t do that if they want to be an elite team. They should have steam rolled Colorado, instead they dug themselves a hole to crawl out of.
I, know, it was just on game, but every single game counts. I was beginning to have high hopes for this team, but I just don’t see the killer instinct in them.
Have you looked at where Colorado is in the standings? BTW, only a handful of teams are above them in the standings. By that logic, the Devils should never lose a game ever to be ‘good enough.’ See my comment above about ‘impossible standards.’ Ask and ye shall receive, I guess.
As of right now, the Lanche have one more point than the Cup champs with the same number of games played. So, if they lose to the Pens are you going to say the same things?
Ta,

by 
























